文法・学術文体チェッカー
論文の段落やセクションを貼り付けると、意味や専門用語、引用を変えることなく、文法・句読点・スペルを修正し、不自然な学術表現を整えます。
Tezyarの編集者が、学術的なトーン、明確さ、ジャーナル投稿への対応という観点から、論文全体を校正・仕上げます。
使い方
- 1確認したい文章を入力欄に貼り付けます。
- 2「実行」をクリックします。
- 3修正後の文章を確認し、文書にコピーして戻します。
こんな方におすすめ
- ✓指導教員に送る前に、草稿のセクションを整える。
- ✓非母語での英語原稿における文法のミスを発見する。
- ✓ジャーナル投稿前に、学術的なトーンを磨き上げる。
- ✓何度も書き直した段落を校正する。
What Is an Academic Grammar Checker?
An academic grammar checker reviews your writing for the same core issues any grammar tool looks for — subject-verb agreement, punctuation, spelling, and sentence structure — but applies rules that fit scholarly writing rather than everyday text. General spellcheckers are built around casual or business prose, so they often flag standard academic constructions (nominalizations, hedging language, long noun phrases, passive constructions used deliberately) as errors when they are actually normal for the register.
This tool is tuned to recognize that context. It corrects genuine grammar and punctuation mistakes and smooths out awkward phrasing, while leaving your terminology, citations, and the substance of your argument untouched. The goal is to clean up the mechanics of a paragraph without pushing your writing toward a more conversational tone than an academic paper calls for.
Common Grammar Issues in Academic Writing
A handful of grammar problems show up repeatedly in academic manuscripts. Subject-verb agreement errors are common in long sentences where the subject and verb are separated by several clauses or parenthetical phrases, making it easy to lose track of number agreement. Passive voice, while sometimes appropriate in academic writing, is frequently overused to the point where sentences become vague about who performed an action, which can weaken a paper's clarity.
Run-on sentences and comma splices tend to appear when writers try to pack multiple related ideas into a single sentence without proper connectors. Article usage (a, an, the) is a frequent challenge for non-native English speakers, since many languages either lack articles or use them differently than English does. Literature reviews often suffer from inconsistent tense, shifting between past tense for describing what other studies did and present tense for stating accepted findings, sometimes within the same paragraph.
Academic Grammar Checking vs General Grammar Checkers
Checking academic writing is a different task from checking an email or a marketing blurb. General-purpose grammar checkers are often optimized to simplify sentences and push toward a more casual, conversational tone, which can strip out the precision that academic writing depends on. They may also flag field-specific terminology, discipline jargon, or established phrasing conventions as mistakes simply because those terms aren't part of everyday vocabulary.
An academic-focused check works differently: it aims to preserve technical vocabulary, keep citations and in-text references exactly as written, and tolerate the more formal, precise register that scholarly writing requires. Rather than flattening your sentences into shorter, plainer ones, the goal is to fix genuine grammar and clarity issues while respecting the conventions of academic register — including the level of formality expected by journals, supervisors, and academic readers.
Responsible Use in Academic Writing
This tool is a proofreading aid, not a substitute for your own judgment about your paper's content, argument, or accuracy. It can catch grammar mistakes, awkward phrasing, and punctuation issues, but it cannot verify facts, evaluate the strength of your argument, or confirm that your citations are complete and correctly formatted. Responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of your work remains with you as the author.
For low-stakes drafts, coursework, or early revisions, an automated check like this one is often enough to tidy up a paragraph before you move on. For high-stakes submissions such as journal manuscripts, theses, or grant applications, consider having your writing reviewed by a supervisor, colleague, or professional academic editor as well — a human reader can catch structural and disciplinary issues that go beyond grammar, in a way automated tools are not designed to do.
よくある質問
いいえ。元の意味と専門用語を保ったまま、文法、句読点、表現のみを修正します。
はい。引用スタイルと位置は、記述されたとおりに正確に保持されます。
最初の確認としては非常に有効です。ただし、投稿に耐えうる原稿に仕上げるには、自動処理では見逃しがちな細かなニュアンスを、人間の学術編集者が確認することをお勧めします。