PRISMA 2020 Support
PRISMA 2020 support for systematic review reporting, flow diagrams, checklists, methods transparency, and manuscript review.
PRISMA 2020 is a reporting guideline for systematic reviews. Tezyar helps researchers map a completed or ongoing review to the PRISMA 2020 checklist, document identification and selection transparently, prepare the flow diagram, and identify reporting gaps before submission.
PRISMA Is a Reporting Framework
PRISMA helps readers understand what was done and found; it does not replace a sound review protocol or correct review methods.
Flow Diagram
Records identified, duplicates removed, screening, full-text assessment, exclusions, and included studies should reconcile numerically and reflect the actual review process.
Methods and Search Reporting
Eligibility criteria, information sources, search strategies, selection processes, data collection, bias assessment, and synthesis methods need enough detail for readers to evaluate reproducibility.
Checklist Audit
A final manuscript-to-checklist audit can identify missing reporting items without inventing methods that were never performed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can PRISMA be added after the review is finished?
Reporting can be improved afterward, but PRISMA cannot repair methodological steps that were not actually performed.
Do you prepare PRISMA flow diagrams?
Yes, using the real record counts and study-selection history from the review.
Related specialized topics
Systematic review search strategy support for concepts, databases, controlled vocabulary, Boolean logic, documentation, and reproducibility.
Risk-of-bias assessment support using study-design-appropriate tools such as RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and JBI instruments.
GRADE support for rating certainty of evidence across outcomes and preparing transparent evidence profiles.
Meta-analysis support in R for effect-size preparation, random- and fixed-effect models, heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and forest plots.
PROSPERO protocol support for eligible systematic reviews: review question, eligibility, outcomes, search approach, bias assessment, and synthesis plan.
Network meta-analysis support for multi-treatment evidence networks, assumptions, modelling, inconsistency assessment, ranking, and reporting.